Queensland’s peak local government association wants safeguards to ensure proposed new electoral spending cap rules for councils don’t end up giving third parties undue influence.

The state government wants to introduce spending caps for mayors, candidates and third parties, such as unions, for all council elections, and canvasses options in a discussion paper released this month.

“These reforms further strengthen the transparency, accountability and integrity measures that apply to the system of local government,” the document says.

Under the government’s proposal, mayoral candidate spending would be capped between $30,000 and $250,000, depending on their number of constituents, while candidate spending would be capped between $15,000 and $30,000.

Registered third parties such as unions or companies would be able to spend up to $3.8 million, “applied flexibly across local government areas”.

‘Aligned interests’

LGAQ chief executive Alison Smith says council elections should be fair, democratic and free from undue influence.

“Any changes to the way local government election campaigns are conducted must ensure fairness, transparency and accountability,” she said in a statement.

“The LGAQ supports the introduction of spending caps so long as they are workable and enhance the democratic process.”

Cr Smith said LGAQ will be making a submission on the proposed changes in coming weeks calling on the government to ensure any new campaign spending cap regime is accompanied by new laws “to prevent the potential distorting influence of third parties with aligned interests”.

Caps ‘based on actual expenditure’

Acting Premier Steven Miles said the government was making the changes based on the recommendations of the states Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC).

The proposed caps for candidates, parties and third parties were similar to those that had successfully been applied to Queensland State elections, he said, and are based upon actual expenditure at local government elections.

They are above what the vast majority of candidates spend historically, he said.

He also said no decision had been made on spending caps, but the discussion paper was the start of a consultation process.