A new report by the Australia Institute puts forward the case for a nation-wide transition to zero-emissions buses by 2030, with local governments pledging to only buy electric buses from 2025.
The report, authored by head of the Climate and Energy program’s transport unit Audrey Quicke and research fellow Sienna Parrott, says there’s wide public support for electric buses, with three in four Australians supporting the electrification of bus fleets by the end of the decade.
The report notes that NSW, Victoria, Queensland and the ACT already have targets and strategies in place to speed the move to electric buses, while the NT, Tasmania, WA and South Australia are lagging.
“There is a role to play at every government level to successfully transition Australia’s bus fleets to zero emissions by 2030,” the report says.
“Transitioning Australia’s bus fleet to electric vehicles powered by 100 per cent renewable energy will bring a range of benefits. Beyond the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, electric buses are quiet and clean – leading to air quality, health, and well-being benefits.
“Additionally, a well-managed network can help curb urban sprawl and congestion, be integrated with cycling and walking infrastructure, and provide affordable transport options for Australians.”
Supporting the transition
The report calls for the federal government to develop an electric bus manufacturing study, introduce fuel efficiency and vehicle emissions standards that extend to buses, and fund bus driver and mechanic retraining programs.
States need to commit to more ambitious electric bus fleet and purchase targets and provide funding for charging infrastructure, the authors say, while local councils should introduce low emissions zones and sign the C40 Green and Healthy Streets Declaration and pledge to only buy electric buses from 2025.
The report list numerous benefits to having a fully electric bus fleet. As well as being more fuel efficient and cheaper to run than their diesel counterparts, and Australian industry could play a role in their manufacture and assembly.
For many people, an electric bus may be their first interaction with an electric vehicle, so electric bus fleets can lead the way in helping overcome barriers to uptake of electric passenger vehicles.
“A visible and thriving electric bus fleet can help combat misconceptions about EVs, particularly perceived range and charging barriers,” the report says.
Challenges
However it also notes the challenges in getting across the line with e-buses, including higher upfront costs – Diesel buses cost around $480,000 compared to between $550,000 and $900,000 for an electric bus.
Land availability for charging depots can be a major constraint to electric bus roll out and there will have to be an investment in charging infrastructure at bus depots to the electricity grid.
There are also some negative experiences from early electric bus trials, including a 2019 ACT pilot that raised questions about their reliability.
The authors of the report warn against waiting for hydrogen fuel cell technology to develop, saying this could hamper the transition to electric buses “as governments wait for hydrogen technology to progress before making electric bus commitments”.
What is the environmental impact of mining the minerals required for battery powered buses, installing the infrastructure to support it and then having to either replace or convert it when hydrogen fuel cell tech is available?
On the surface it may seem like “zero emission” targets are being met but is the resulting overall impact really any better the existing system?
Could it just be replacing a visible problem with an invisible one while appearing to tick boxes and meet declarations/pledges?
Government operated EV and EBuses are not the magic bullet. Where as Better Local planning that create walk able cities and rapidly move to minimizing the need to drive all types of powered vehicles is a Longer and more vital way of being environmentally responsible.
Councils and public transport authorities Give themselves a big green tick for having E Vehicles and continue to endorse / allow for car centric development to be perpetuated . This creates a deficit in climate responsibility.
So while the provision of E Buses are a worthwhile initiative. and a more stable and less environmentally damaging alternative to Lithium Iron technology need to be the research priority .